bots.st/praxikon
Praxikon
EU AI Act and GDPR duties with sources
3359 ms
answered our call
- State
- Answered
- Protocol
- MCP 2025-06-18
- Tools listed
- 9
- Answered
- 3 of the last 3 calls
How to reach it
- MCP, HTTP
https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp
What it can do
| Tool | What it says it does |
|---|---|
answer_question | Use this for a short, general question about the EU AI Act or the GDPR (AVG), such as whether a customer service chatbot has to say that it is AI or when a DPIA is required. It looks the question up in the published Praxikon answers: deterministic, no language model, and with the articles and… |
check_case | Use this when the user describes a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data (a system, a project, a supplier) and wants to know whether a DPIA, a FRIA or duties under the GDPR (AVG) and the EU AI Act come into play. It runs the Praxikon case check: fixed rules over fixed answers, the same… |
classify_system | Use this as the first step when you hold a concrete AI system and need to know which routes of the EU AI Act come into view: prohibited practice screening, Annex III high risk, transparency, FRIA and the general purpose model route, and with a version 2 profile the wider set of duties, such as… |
explain_applicability | Use this whenever you have to justify why an obligation does or does not bear on a case, and an outcome on its own is not enough. It returns the legal path: the conditions under which the rule is about a situation, the exceptions under which it is not despite those conditions, and the statements… |
export_dpia_intake | Use this when the user wants the DPIA intake of a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data as a Word file to work on, and, where the FRIA comes into play, the FRIA draft too. It takes the same fixed fact answers as the case check of Praxikon, as coded choices, and gives the same documents… |
get_applicable_obligations | Use this when you need the obligations themselves for one assessed system rather than the classification picture: which obligations apply, which possibly apply, from when, why, and on which source and locator. Returns one entry per assessed obligation, filtered by applicability. A version 2… |
get_national_enforcement | Use this for the national layer: which authority is designated in a member state, how far the implementing law has come, and which dated enforcement signals are recorded, each with a primary source. The authority is recorded as free text per member state and is deliberately not a graph identifier… |
get_source_provenance | Use this before you quote, cite or hand on anything from this graph, and whenever a reader asks on what authority a statement rests. It returns, for one object, every statement with its kind, its primary source, the locator inside that source and the review metadata, plus the source records behind… |
request_expert_review | Use this only when the user asks for it in their own words: they want to talk to a person, ask for a human expert, or ask how to get in touch about their situation. Never call it on your own initiative, never as a closing suggestion, and never because an answer seems uncertain. It returns a link… |
In its maker's words
EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor.
- Website
- www.praxikon.com/en/ai-assistant
- Publisher
- praxikon.com
- Listed from
- the official MCP Registry as
com.praxikon/praxikon - Version
- 2.3.1, updated 11 Oct 2026
- Kinds of work
- Law, tax and government, Security and trust, Search and research
The domain it lives on
- praxikon.com
- registered 10 Aug 2026 (3 months ago), at REGISTER S.P.A., its home page is a working site
From our own crawl of domain names: registry records and the home page as our crawler last saw it.
Every call we made
| When | What happened | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Answered | 3359 ms | |
| Answered | 3392 ms | |
| Answered | 1990 ms |
Next door
Is this your bot? Claim its address to add a verified badge and keep the listing current.